Gewinnchance

Rational? – Test 11: „Das bessere Glücksspiel“

Test 11 Welches Glücksspiel würden Sie bevorzugen? a. Beim Glücksspiel A besteht eine 30-prozentige Chance, 2.000 €, und eine 70-prozentige Chance, 50 € zu gewinnen. b. Beim Glücksspiel B besteht eine 30-prozentige Chance auf einen Gewinn von 400 € und eine 70-prozentige Chance auf einen Gewinn von 1.100 €. (Aufgabenstellung aus: Droste, 2022, S. 385-387; Stanovich & Toplak, 2016, S. 359-360) Weiter zu Test 12: „Wissenschaft und Alternativen“ Quellen Droste, H. W. (2022). Entfessele Dein bestes Denken. Pedion Verlag Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2016). The rationality quotient: Toward a test of rational thinking….

weiter lesen Rational? – Test 11: „Das bessere Glücksspiel“

The „All-Crusher“ Myth and the Grand Illusion of Immanuel Kant
Deconstructing the Mandarin of Königsberg #9 Over the past eight weeks, we have undertaken an uncompromising, evidence-based expedition through the intellectual fortress of Immanuel Kant. We dismantled the myth of the scientific genius,...
Remembering Mario Bunge: The Public Intellectual Who Tackled Big Questions
Remembering Mario Bunge: The Public Intellectual Who Tackled Big Questions By Heinz W. DrostePublished on September 21, 2026 On September 21, the international scientific and philosophical community marks the birthday of Mario Augusto...
A New Compass for the 21st Century—Moving Beyond the Dictatorship of Reason
Deconstructing the Mandarin of Königsberg #8 Over the past seven weeks, we have embarked on a rigorous, evidence-based expedition through the formidable intellectual fortress of Immanuel Kant. We have systematically dismantled the myths...
Kant’s Authoritarian State
Deconstructing the Mandarin of Königsberg # 7 Over the past six weeks, we have systematically dismantled the intellectual fortress of Immanuel Kant. We have exposed his physical and cosmological errors, stripped away the...
The Theological Trap and the Intellectual Racism of Pure Reason
Deconstructing the Mandarin of Königsberg, Part 6 For generations, Immanuel Kant has been celebrated as the supreme secular champion of the European Enlightenment. Traditional academic narratives insist that his ethical system is based...
The Categorical Imperative on Trial
Why Kantian Duty Ethics Collapses in the Face of Moral Psychology and Modern Democracy For more than two centuries, the Categorical Imperative has occupied the throne of Western moral philosophy. Taught in schools,...
The Copernican Revolution Fallacy
The Ptolemaic Relapse: Why Kant’s „Copernican Revolution“ Is an Epistemological Illusion (and the 18th-Century Matrix) In the Preface to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason (1787), Immanuel Kant introduced what...
The Dogmatic Slumber Fallacy: Why David Hume Woke Immanuel Kant to Save Faith and Duty, Not Empirical Science
In the annals of Western philosophical history, few anecdotes are quoted with such reverent regularity as Immanuel Kant’s dramatic awakening from his „dogmatic slumber.“ In the preface to his Prolegomena to Any Future...
The Scientific Genius Myth: Did Immanuel Kant Truly Understand Physics?
In standard histories of Western thought, Immanuel Kant is celebrated not only as a titan of philosophy, but as a groundbreaking scientific visionary. Popular accounts and academic textbooks routinely credit him with two...
The Cognitive Prosthesis: Why We Turn Immanuel Kant into an Intellectual Crutch
For over two centuries, Western intellectual culture has revered Immanuel Kant as the ultimate lighthouse of the Enlightenment, the undisputed architect of modern reason, and the intellectual father of human autonomy. In academic...
Kants kategorischer Imperativ auf dem Prüfstand
Kants kategorischer Imperativ auf dem Prüfstand Ein philosophischer Streifzug durch 200 Jahre moralischer Selbstüberschätzung Stellen wir uns vor, Sie sitzen beim nächsten Familienfest und jemand fragt in die Runde: „Wer kennt eigentlich Kants...